Blue Yonder Aviation, inc.

Kit Manufacturing Learn to Fly About Us Contact Us Home

Kitplanes

"Merlin's Magic"

November 1995 (Page 76)...Reprinted with permission
By LeRoy Cook

Well-designed airplanes can have their basic structures adapted for many different uses, as well as incorporate modifications without undue effort. The Merlin GT I flew for this pilot report is such an airplane. It can fly with various power plants, carry a good load and land in just about any farm field -and it can even give up its wings and WI feathers to create a lightweight offspring: the E-Z Flyer, a plane that lives up to its name (see the sidebar).

The Merlin GT

The Merlin is a perky two-place tail dragger kit aircraft designed by John Burch in 1989 as an answer to the need for an off-airport bushplane that was a bit more roomy and rugged than the tiny aluminum-frame airplanes on the market. "It was designed to land just about anywhere," says Burch, now general manager of Merlin Aircraft. "For that reason, we're known as the Jeep of the kit airplane industry."


Originally produced as the Macair Industries Merlin, the firm has been owned since 1993 by Reg and Kevin Adarns, operators of a large warehousing and transportation company, headquartered in Muskegon, Michigan. Merlin now ships kits to just about any part of the world where a simple-to-build, rugged aircraft is needed; one of the airplanes on the flight line when we visited was headed for Portugal. Some 200 Merlins had been sold by the end of 1993, according to Burch.

An Arkansas Reunion

Because winter had already arrived at the Michigan factory, we met at a slightly warmer location, the unofficial Merlin skunk works in Jonesboro, Arkansas, situated on the Classic Airstrip east of town. Merlin's dealer and development specialist in Jonesboro, Scott Haggenmacher, was on hand with Burch to show off the company's latest achievement, the Forinula/N4erlin power package installed on a Merlin GT airframe.

Subaru Power

The new powerplant is a much-enhanced conversion of the Subaru EA 81 flat-four, liquid-cooled auto engine, built by Formula Power in Concord, California. The Formula/Merlin puts out I 10 hp on the dynamometer at 4800 rpm and weighs 185 pounds with its 1:1.84 ratio cog-belt reduction drive. All-up, ready-to-fly weight, including exhaust, radiator and vital fluids, is only 230 pounds. Obviously, this is no stock automobile engine; Formula Power adds goodies like hydraulic valve lifters, dual independent ignition and an airflow fuel injection system, then carefully balances and blueprints the engine, resulting in a conversion ideally suited to the Merlin. An SAE No. I prop hub mounts a three blade Great American fixed-pitch wood propeller on the dark-blue testbed airplane, which had been built up by Scott Haggenmacher and crew.


The Merlin has evolved from using the two-stroke Rotax 582/618, Re a lot of light kit airplanes. With the development of the Formula/Merlin package, Merlin Aircraft plans to offer three engine options: the Rotax 912 (which we also flew for comparison), the Subaru conversion, and the old reliable Continental small-fours of 65-85 hp. The lightweight Rotax carries its battery on the firewall to keep the c.g. from moving too far aft, while the Formula and Continental engines have the battery in the baggage compartment.

Nose to Tail

The GT's composite cowling is relatively blunt, accentuated on the Formula powered airplane by the fact that it was operating without a spinner for test purposes. At the time of our flight, only 10 hours had been logged since the installation. The 24x18-inch aluminum radiator -from a Volkswagen Scirocco- was positioned on an adjustable mount behind and below the engine, near the c.g. By comparison, the Rotax 912's radiator and oil cooler are mounted under the forward part of the compact engine, visible through an inlet under the spinner. In both cases, the cowling could be opened quickly by CamLoc fasteners for inspection or maintenance.


The standard fuel system consists of a single 13-gallon tank above the cabin, its contents visible simply by looking up. Both of the demonstrator aircraft we flew had the popular dual-tank option, using 8-gallon aluminum tanks in each wing and electric gauging, which allows an overhead skylight to be installed.

The Merlin GT's wing structure consists of a 9-inch-deep aluminum spar with a 0.040-inch-thick web, doubled to 0.080 from the strut attachment point inboard. A load-carrying D-section leading edge is supplied already attached to the spar, with only the rib attachment rivets left out for the builder to install. Nose ribs are factory fitted at 6-inch intervals; the wing bay ribs, with 24-inch spacing, are high-density foam with aluminum caps and spacers. The PolyFiber wing covering is pop-riveted directly to the caps. A massive 1.5-inch drag strut runs from the rear wing-folding fuselage attachment to the spar, and the 2-inch tubular aluminum lift strut, streamlined with a plastic fairing, assures accurate dihedral.

Burch is proud of the Merlin's quick assembly and simplicity of rigging; when the struts and fittings mount to the fuselage, the wing is prealigned. Wing folding is provided for compact storage; Merlin does not recommend routine folding for towing or trailering, due to the possibility of damage from road rash. The fuselage truss is a prealigned assembly of 5/8-inch steel tubing, a distinguishing Merlin hallmark.

Burch prefers paint over powder coating because it is much easier to remove, should it ever become necessary. A 100 pound-capacity baggage compartment of 1/4-inch plywood is behind the seats, reached by lifting the hat tray. The seats are not adjustable but can accommodate varying sizes of people by installing or removing cushions. Swing-up doors are fitted on both sides of the fuselage, latching to the underside of the wing. They may be opened and closed in flight, but the long stretch into the slipstream to reach the handle can be a challenge.

The almost-square platform of the tail surfaces is a trademark of the Merlin design; the horizontal tail has a 7-foot span and a 3.58-foot chord. The empennage comes prebuilt, needing only covering and a couple of holes drilled to be ready for installation. In fact, the whole Merlin GT project requires but 350 to 450 hours to build -a figure supported by several builders, Burch says. Merlin also prides itself in supplying a complete kit--engine, propeller, covering, tires- everything to make a flyable ready-to-paint airplane.

Comparing the Merlin GT Engine Options

The day was crisp and bracing for Arkansas -one of those days when the air will be fat with lift and any ripples will probably be due to your own wake turbulence. We first climbed aboard the maroon-colored, Rotax-powered GT to see how it performed on the 78-hp 912; venturi-driven gyro instruments were installed, as was an electric turn-and-bank, and a three blade, ground adjustable Warp Drive propeller was fitted, replacing the standard two-blade unit.


Once aboard, there was more than ample room for two well-bundled individuals; the optional overhead skylight aids forward and upward visibility and gives an added air of openness to the cockpit. In response to the burning question of the day, Bruce said, yes, a cabin heater could easily be plumbed from the radiator; he suggested a salvaged motorcycle radiator, complete with fan, or a Ford Escort heater core, both perfect for the job. Toe brakes were installed on the left rudder pedals only, so we gladly relinquished that seat to Burch until we got familiar with the Merlin's handling.

A pull of the choke and a twist of the key brought the Rotax to life, and once it had warmed up into a stable unchoked idle we were ready to go. Taxiing is wonderfully straightforward, the steer-able tailwheel pivots the Merlin on a dime, and there's little need for brakes with proper planning. The wide-track Merlin is so stable on the ground that an intentional groundloop is recommended in an emergency short-rollout situation, usually resulting in no damage. The dual ignition modules were checked and the instruments set and verified; once the controls were tested and the trim tab was adjusted, we were out of excuses. It was time to fly.

The 912 wound up quickly to 5200 rpm, hopping us off in a few hundred feet at 40 mph indicated. We pulled up quickly into a steep 50-mph climb, resulting in a solid 600-fpm ascent with two aboard, later improving to 800 fpm when we flew solo. We leveled at 1000 feet to set up a routine 4600 rpm cruise, which resulted in an 82-mph IAS. Handling was predictable, with acceptable stick-free stability in pitch and a modicum of yaw-roll coupling to allow us to rudder a wing back up if our hands were busy. While the long Junkers-style ailerons generated some adverse yaw, there was plenty of rudder power to persuade the Merlin to start and stop turns. The Rotax muffler on the 912 resulted in an extremely quiet cockpit for a light aircraft; most of the noise was from the rush of the wind and the rattling of the doors.

In stalls, we found a good burble and mild break at 42 mph power off, slowing to 35 mph when we cranked in some throttle. If aggravated, the Merlin would drop a wing, but it allowed us plenty of time to get out before that occurred. Back at the home port, we shot a few approaches at 60 mph, slipping off excess altitude when we arrived a bit high. Burch eschews flaps or flaperons, avoiding the added complexity and degraded aileron effectiveness. Landings were an easy transition from a tailwheel-first touchdown to fast taxiing. We consistently turned around at the 800-foot point, even while landing over a set of power lines. Ground roll was probably 300-400 feet, with no brakes needed. One caveat was pointed out by Burch: The slope of the cowling sides causes the nose to taper in toward the front of the engine, leading one to touch down with the aircraft pointed at the side of the runway, rather than the centerline. Once noted, it can be accommodated by a top of the rudder.

Behind the Formula/Merlin Engine


Switching over to the Subaru-conversion Merlin, we found a somewhat heavier, more solid-feeling airplane. Choke and timing are entirely automatic, so starting and runup is a non-event; there is a mixture control, unlike the Rotax installations, and two electric fuel pumps are standard, one full-duty pump and a second standby pump switched on for takeoff and landing. Starting requires some priming action by the primary fuel pump, after which it is turned off to avoid flooding; once the engine is cranked into life, the fuel pump is brought on line to smooth the idle.


Taxiing reveals the extra weight of the Formula power package; some leaning helps keep the engine smoother during taxi. Runup was elementary, as there was no ignition check (the developmental engine did not have the production powerplant's redundant pickups, coils and modules), few instruments to scan and the engine was still warm from a previous test hop, At full power we hopped off with 4800 rpm in the climbout; we netted about 700 fpm with the two of us aboard, holding about 55 mph for the climb. Leveled into cruise, we saw an easy 93 mph at 4500 rpm, and 4200 rpm maintained about 90 mph; the engine was very smooth at this power setting, after the busy climbout power.

The aircraft's heavier feel resulted in friendly manners at cruise. With the c.g. moved forward by the heavier engine, pitch stability was noticeably improved. The controls were stiffer, from both added weight and speed. The noise level was... well, loud. The prototype exhaust lashup was to be changed to a more effective system, Burch said.

Landing approaches were flown at 60-65 mph, completely power off, and the Merlin touched down at 45-50 mph, rolling out in less than 500 feet. As with the, Rotax-powered airplane, the wide gear and docile handling made landings simple, as long as we remembered the curve of the cowling.

Given that the Formula/Merlin engine can deliver more than 30 extra horsepower for $1000 or so less investment and with but 50 pounds of added weight, it seems to be a good bet for a Merlin GT powerplant. I had few complaints about the way the Merlin flew; I would prefer the dual throttle setup, so I could retain my right-hand-on-stick, left-hand-on-throttle geometry, and it would be nice to have the elevator trim twist-knob between the seats, rather than under the pilot's left knee. All in all, however, the sturdy little Merlin is exactly what it is claimed to be; a rugged boondocks airplane that isn't afraid to get dirty. KP

Reprinted/Distributed with permission
By LeRoy Cook; Kitplanes magazine; November 1995
copyright 1995


back to Articles page